Member-only story

Marginality and Social Control in Madrid: 1850-1930. Currents in Latin American Urban History.

Herbert Cox

·8.7k Followers· Follow

Published in Discordant Notes: Marginality And Social Control In Madrid 1850 1930 (Currents In Latin American And Iberian Music)

6 min read

1.3k View Claps

85 Respond

Save

Listen

Discordant Notes: Marginality and Social Control in Madrid, 1850-1930 (Currents in Latin American and Iberian Music)

by Samuel Llano

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2523 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Print length	:	272 pages
Lending	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported

The concept of marginality has been widely used in social sciences to refer to the condition of individuals or groups who are excluded from the mainstream of society. This exclusion can be based on a variety of factors, such as poverty, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or disability. While marginality has often been seen as a negative condition, it can also be a source of resilience and creativity. Marginalized individuals and groups can develop their own cultures and social networks, which can provide them with a sense of belonging and support.

In the context of Madrid during the period 1850-1930, marginality was a complex and contested social category. The city was undergoing rapid urbanization and industrialization, which led to the influx of large numbers of migrants from rural areas. These migrants often found themselves living in貧民窟。 or shantytowns, and they faced discrimination and exclusion from the more established residents of the city.

The authorities in Madrid responded to the problem of marginality in a variety of ways. They built new housing projects for the poor, and they implemented social welfare programs to provide assistance to the needy. They also cracked down on crime and disorder in the貧民窟。. These measures were often ineffective, and they did little to improve the lives of the marginalized population.

The concept of marginality has been used in a variety of ways to understand the social and economic changes that occurred in Madrid during the period 1850-1930. Some scholars have argued that marginality was a product of the city's rapid urbanization and industrialization. Others have emphasized the role of social and political factors, such as discrimination and exclusion. Still others have seen marginality as a more positive force, arguing that it can lead to the development of new cultures and social networks.

The debate over the meaning of marginality is likely to continue for many years to come. However, there is no doubt that the concept is a valuable tool for understanding the social and economic history of Madrid during the period 1850-1930.

The Changing Meanings of Marginality

The meaning of marginality has changed over time. In the early 19th century, the term was used to refer to people who lived on the边缘of society. These people were often poor, homeless, and criminal. By the late 19th century, the meaning of marginality had expanded to include people who were excluded from the mainstream of society due to their race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation.

The changing meanings of marginality in Madrid during the period 1850-1930 reflect the changing social and economic conditions of the city. As the city grew and industrialized, the number of marginalized people increased. The authorities struggled to find effective ways to deal with this problem, and the resulting social tensions contributed to the city's political instability.

Social Control and Marginality

Social control is a set of mechanisms that are used to maintain order and stability in society. These mechanisms can include laws, regulations, and social norms. Social control can be exercised by the state, by religious institutions, or by other groups or organizations.

In the context of Madrid during the period 1850-1930, social control was used in a variety of ways to deal with the problem of marginality. The authorities built new housing projects for the poor, and they implemented social welfare programs to provide assistance to the needy. They also cracked down on crime and disorder in the貧民窟。. These measures were often ineffective, and they did little to improve the lives of the marginalized population.

The use of social control to deal with marginality was often counterproductive. The harsh measures that were used to crack down on crime and disorder in the貧民窟。 often alienated the marginalized population and made them more resistant to the authorities. The social welfare programs that were implemented were often inadequate and did little to improve the lives of the poor. As a result, social control often exacerbated the problem of marginality rather than solving it.

The concept of marginality is a complex and contested one. It has been used in a variety of ways to understand the social and economic changes that occurred in Madrid during the period 1850-1930. Some scholars have argued that marginality was a product of the city's rapid urbanization and industrialization. Others have emphasized the role of social and political factors, such as discrimination and exclusion. Still others have seen marginality as a more positive force, arguing that it can lead to the development of new cultures and social networks.

Discordant Notes: Marginality and Social Control in Madrid, 1850-1930 (Currents in Latin American and Iberian Music)

by Samuel Llano

5 out of 5